THERMAL AND NON-THERMAL METHODS OF TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY VARICOSЕ DISEASES OF THE LOWER LIMBS OF STAGE C2
ARTICLE PDF (Українська)

Keywords

varicose veins, endovenous laser ablation, endovenous mechanochemical ablation, echo-controlled introduction of bioglue.

How to Cite

Shaprynskyy, V., Shaprynskyi, V., & Semenenko, N. (2021). THERMAL AND NON-THERMAL METHODS OF TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY VARICOSЕ DISEASES OF THE LOWER LIMBS OF STAGE C2. Clinical and Preventive Medicine, (4), 45-50. https://doi.org/10.31612/2616-4868.4(18).2021.07

Abstract

Abstract. Treatment results of primary varicose disorders has been shown. The experience of using of thermal (endovenous laser ablation) and non-thermal methods (endovenous mechanochemical ablation, echo-controlled introduction of bioglue) in treatment of stage C2 chronic venous is shown. The purpose of this work is to evaluate the efficiency of endovenous ablation techniques. The treatment of 58 patients was analyzed. In the group of patients who underwent endovenous laser obliteration, reflux was not detected. In the group of patients with mechanochemical obliteration, reflux was determined in 3 patients (27.2%) at follow-up after 3 months required supplementation with foam sclerobliteration. In the group of patients with the introduction of bio glue, reflux was determined in 1 patient (20%) at the examination after 3 months. The received results lead to conclusion, that endovenous laser coagulation of affected veins is a reliable method of threatment, the gold standard. The advantage of non-thermal methods is the absence of thermal effects on the paravenous structures, respectively, patients have no pain during the procedure, increases comfort, and there is no risk of damage to the paravenous nerves. Another advantage of non-thermal techniques is no need to use of tumescent anesthesia, since only one puncture is required for the operation, which is comfortable for patients. The use of adhesive vein obliteration is justified in patients with signs of a short reflux duration and has an advantage for the patient due to the absence of the need for compression in the postoperative period. Non-thermal methods require further research and widespread implementation in practice.

https://doi.org/10.31612/2616-4868.4(18).2021.07
ARTICLE PDF (Українська)

References

Osmanov, R. R. (2016). A middle-term results of endovenous laser ablation for varicose disease of the lower extremities. Klin Khir., 2, 48-51.

Uthoff, H., Spinedi, L., Lattmann, T., Broz, P., Staub, D. (2016). Well-Tried, New Ones – update varicose vein treatment 2016. Praxis, 105(14), 813-9.

Leung C. C., Carradice D., Wallace T., Chetter I. C. (2016). Endovenous laser ablation versus mechanochemical ablation with ClariVein(®) in the management of superficial venous insufficiency (LAMA trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials, 17(1), 421-31.

Ammollo R.P., Petrone A., Giribono A. M., Ferrante, L del Guercio,1Early Results of Mechanochemical Ablation with Flebogrif® in great Saphenous Vein Insufficiency: does Polidocanol Concentration Affect Outcome? (2020). Transl Med UniSa, Jan-Apr, 21, 47–51. PMCID: PMC7039266

Tomasz Zubilewicz, Piotr Terlecki, Karol Terlecki, Stanislaw Przywara, Janusz Rybak, Marek Ilzecki (2016). Application of endovenous mechanochemical ablation (MOCA) with Flebogrif™ to treat varicose veins of the lower extremities: a single center experience over 3 months of observation. Acta Angiologica, 22(4),137-142 DOI: 10.5603/AA.2016.0012

Tamana Alozai Eline Huizing Michiel Schreve Michael C.Mooij Clarissa J.van Vlijmen, Willem Wisselink, Çağdaş Ünlü. A systematic review and meta-analysis of mechanochemical endovenous ablation using Flebogrif for varicose veins: A summary of evidence. Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.05.010

Ciostek, P., Kowalski, M., Woźniak, W., Miłek, T., Myrcha, P., Migda, B. (2015). Phlebogriffe a new device for mechanochemical ablation of incompetent saphenous veins: a pilot study. Phlebol Rev, 23, 72-77.

Soliman, M. D., Ahmed, H. (2019). Mechano-chemical endo-venous ablation of varicose veins with Flebogrif occlusion catheter. Med J Cairo Univ, 87, 3749-3754.

Lajos, P., Weiss, R., Weber, J., Marin, M., Faries, P. (2017). Use of compression wraps immediately after venous closure: does it matter? J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord, 5, 164-165

Lane, T., Bootun, R., Dharmarajah, B., et al. (2017). A multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing radiofrequency and mechanical occlusion chemically assisted ablation of varicose veins - final results of the venefit versus clarivein for varicose veins trial. Phlebology, 32(2),89–98. doi:10.1177/0268355516651026

Tal M. G., Dos Santos S. J., Marano J. P., Whiteley M. S. (2015). Histologic findings after mechanochemical ablation in a caprine model with use of clariVein. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord., 3(1), 81–85. doi:10.1016/j.jvsv.2014.07.002

Boersma, D., van Haelst, STW, van Eekeren, RRJP, et al. (2017). Macroscopic and histologic analysis of vessel wall reaction after mechanochemical endovenous ablation using the clariVein OC device in an animal model. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 53(2), 290–298. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.11.024

Van Eekeren, RRJP, Boersma, D., Konijn, V., JPPM, D. V., Reijnen, MMJP. (2013). Postoperative pain and early quality of life after radiofrequency ablation and mechanochemical endovenous ablation of incompetent great saphenous veins. J Vasc Surg., 57(2), 445–450.

Belramman ,A., Bootun, R., Tang, T. Y., Lane, T.R.A, Davies, A.H. (2018). Mechanochemical ablation versus cyanoacrylate adhesive for the treatment of varicose veins: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials., 19(1), 1–8. doi:10.1186/s13063-018-2807-0

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.