Varicocele and its complications: pathogenesis, improving of surgical treatment
ARTICLE PDF (Українська)

Keywords

varicocele, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP), operation of Marmara

How to Cite

Boyko, M. I., & Chornukulsky, I. S. (2018). Varicocele and its complications: pathogenesis, improving of surgical treatment. Clinical and Preventive Medicine, (2-3), 33-42. https://doi.org/10.31612/2616-4868.2-5.2018.04

Abstract

There are many views on the causes of the varicocele. But none of them is uncontested and causes a lot of questions. During the last several years, matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) have been shown to be involved in many pathological processes. MMPs form a family of Zn-dependent endopeptidases, which have the property of destroying the main components of the extracellular matrix. The existence of a large number of methods of operative treatment of varicocele indicates not only the author's different views on the etiology and pathogenesis of the disease, but also indirectly indicates dissatisfaction with the results of treatment, where the catamnesis relapse ranges from 10 to 43%.

The aim of the study was to study the pathogenetic characteristics of the development of varicocele and its complications, namely the participation of MSM as a marker of this disease and the improvement of surgical treatment of varicocele.

Material and methods. 190 patients with varicose veins of the left spermatic cord and 25 virtually healthy men with vasectomy were examined and operated. Patients in the main group (100 patients) performed subinvaginal microsurgical varicocelectomy (SMV) according to the classic Marmara method, and patients with control (90 patients) - laparoscopic varicoselectomy (LV). During the operation, under the control of an optical increase, a part of the varicose vein of the spermatic cord was collected. The preparations were placed in liquid nitrogen and transported to the laboratory on the basis of the "Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology. RE. Kavetsky "National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, where they determined the level of MMP-2 and MMP-9. The evaluation of proteolytic activity was carried out by measuring the area of the lysis zone and determining the concentration of active forms of enzymes using a standard set of matrix metalloproteinases ("Sigma"). To calculate the results, the t-criterion for independent samples was used. Information was processed using the IBM SPSS Statistics 20 program.

Results. In our study, there was a significant increase in the levels of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP): MMP-2 and MMP-9 in men with varicose veins of spermatic cord compared with men without signs of this disease. The average level of matrix metalloproteinases in the wall of the spermatic vein of patients with varicocele was: MMP-2 - 2.13Ѓ}1.96 and MMP-9 - 2.7Ѓ}2.51, which exceeded the same values in men of the control group at 23 and 27 times (p<0.05). In addition, the levels of matrix metalloproteinases differed significantly, depending on the degree of the disease. Levels of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in patients with varicocele level 2 were higher in patients with varicocele 1 degree by 62% and 64% respectively (p<0.05). Indicators of patients with varicocele of 3 degrees in turn outperformed the 2nd degree by 64% and 65%. As a result of our studies, the frequency of relapses in LV and AMD groups was determined to be 8.89% and 2.0%, respectively (p<0.05). In the CMV group, no case of hydrocele was detected – 0%, whereas the hydrocele frequency in the LV group was 3.3% (p<0.05). The duration of surgical intervention was greatest at CMV (52.0 Ѓ} 1.03 min), while the duration of postoperative inpatient treatment in this group was the lowest (6.13Ѓ}0.14 hours – 0.25 days). Time of finding in the department of patients after LV was 4 times longer (1.17Ѓ}0.03 days) compared with the group of LMW.

Conclusions. The level of the content of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in the wall of the spermatic vein is significantly increased in varicocele and can be considered a marker of the disease. The increase in the content of MMP-2 and MMP-9 correlates with an increase in the degree of varicocele. The method of microsurgical subinvaginal varicoselectomy has advantages in comparison with laparoscopic varicoselectomy in terms of postoperative complications of relapse rate and postoperative stay of a patient in a hospital. The method of microsurgical subinvivalal varicoselectomy may be recommended for introduction into specialized medical institutions of Ukraine.

https://doi.org/10.31612/2616-4868.2-5.2018.04
ARTICLE PDF (Українська)

References

1. Gorelick J. I. Goldstein M. (1993). Loss of fertility in men with varicocele. Fertil Steril., 59(3), 613-616.
2. Witt M. A., Lipshultz L. I. (1993). Varicocele: a progressive or static lesion?. Urology, 42(5), 541-543.
3. Gentile Di L., Pigozzi F. (2001). Physical activity as a possible aggravating factor for athletes with varicocele: impact on the semen profile. Human Reproduction, 16(6), 1180–1184.
4. Skoog S., Roberts K. P., Goldstein M., Pryor J. L. (1997). The adolescent varicocele: what's new with an old problem in young patients? Pediatrics, 100, 1, 112-121.
5. Visse R., Hideaki Nagase (2003). Matrix Metalloproteinases and Tissue Inhibitors of Metalloproteinases. Structure, Function, and Biochemistry. Circulation Research., 92, 827-839.
6. De Clerk Y. A., Perez N., Shimada H. (1992). Inhibition of invasion and metastasis in cells transfected with an inhibitor of metalloproteinases. Cancer research., 52, 701-708.
7. Eid R. A., Radad K., Al-Shraim M. (2012). Ultrastructural changes of smooth muscles in varicocele veins. Ultrastruct Pathol., 36(4), 201-206. doi: 10.3109/01913123.2011.637663.
8. Allan J., Docherty A. J., Barker P. J. (1995). Binding of gelatinases A and B to type-I collagen and other matrix components. Biochem J., 309, 299-306.
9. Saleh R., Agarwal A., Nada E., El-Tonsy M., Sahrama R., Meyer A., Nelson D., Jr Thomas A. (2003). Evaluation of nuclear DNA damage in spermatozoa from infertile men with varicocele. Fertil Steril., 80, 1431-1436.
10. Goldstein M., Gilbert B. R., Dicker A. P., Dwosh J., Gnecco C. (1992). Microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy with delivery of the testis: an artery and lymphatic sparing technique. J Urol., 148, 6, 1808-1811.
11. Robert V., Hideaki Nagase. (2003). Matrix Metalloproteinases and Tissue Inhibitors of Metalloproteinases. Structure, Function, and Biochemistry. Circulation Research., 92, 827-839.
12. Cayan S., Shavakhabov S., Kadioğlu (2009). Review. Treatment of palpable varicocele in infertile men: a metaanalysis to define the best technique. A. J Androl., 30, 1, 33-40.
13. Woodside K. J., Hu M., Burke A., Murakami M., Pounds L. L., Killewich L. A., Daller J. A., Hunter G. C. (2003). Morphologic characteristics of varicose veins: possible role of metalloproteinases. J Vasc Surg., 38, 162–169.
14. Rais-Bahrami S., Montag S., George A. K., Rastinehad A. R., Palmer L. S., Siegel D. N. (2012). Angiographic findings of primary versus salvage varicoceles treated with selective gonadal vein embolization: an explanation for surgical treatment failure. J Endourol., 26, 5, 556- 560.
15. Kaufman S., Kadir S., Barth K. H., Smyth J. W., Walsh P. C., White R. I. (1983). Mechanisms of recurrent varicocele after balloon occlusion or surgical ligation of the internal spermatic vein. Jr. Radiology, 147, 2, 435-4.
16. Skoog S., Skoog S. J., Roberts K. P., Goldstein M., Pryor J. L. (1997). The adolescent varicocele: what's new with an old problem in young patients? Pediatrics, 100, 1, 112-121.
17. Schwentner C., Radmayr C., Lunacek A., Gozzi C., Pinaggera G. M., Neururer R. (2006). Laparoscopic varicocele ligation in children and adolescents using isosulphan blue: A prospective randomized trial. BJU Int., 98, 861-865.
18. Oswald J. Korner I., Riccabona M. (2001). The use of isosulphan blue to identify lymphatic vessels in high retroperitoneal ligation of adolescent varicocele-avoiding postoperative hydrocele. BJU Int., 87, 502-504.
19. D'Alessio A., Piro E., Beretta F., Brugnoni M., Marinoni F., Abati L. (2008). Lymphatic preservation using methylene blue dye during varicocele surgery: A singlecenter retrospective study. J Pediatr Urol., 4, 138-140.
20. Kocvara R., Dvorácek J,, Sedlácek J,, Díte Z,, Novák K. (2005). Lymphatic sparing laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a microsurgical repair. J Urol. 173, 5, 1751-1754.
21. Ahlberg N. E., Hartley 0., Chidekel N. Right and left gonadal veins: an anatomical and statistical study. Acta Radiol [Diagn] (Stockh). 1966.
22. Braedel H. A. Steffens J., Ziegler M., Polsky M. S., Platt M. L. (1994). Possible ontogenic etiology for idiopathic left varicocele. J Urol., 151(1), 62-6.
23. Sigmund G., Sigmund G., Bähren W., Gall H., Lenz M., Thon W. (1987). Idiopathic varicoceles: feasibility of percutaneous sclerotherapy. Radiology, 164(1), 161-8.
24. Shafik A., Bedeir G. A. (1980).Venous tension patterns in cord veins. I. In normal and varicocele individuals. J Urol., 123(3), 383-5.
25. Shafik A., Gall H., Rudofsky G., Bähren W., Roth J., Altwein J. E. (1987). A. Intravascular pressure measurements and phlebography of the renal vein: a contribution to the etiology of varicocele. Urologe, 26(6), 325-30.
26. Першуков А. И. Варикоцеле и некоторые вопросы мужского бесплодия Киев, 2002.
27. Eid R., Radad K., Al-Shraim M. (2012). Ultrastructural changes of smooth muscles in varicocele veins. Ultrastruct Pathol., 36(4), 201-6. doi: 10.3109/01913123.2011.637663.
28. Somers P., Knaapen M. (2006). The histopathology of varicose vein disease. Angiology, 57(5), 546-55.
29. Robert Visse, Hideaki Nagase (2003). Matrix Metalloproteinases and Tissue Inhibitors of Metalloproteinases. Structure, Function, and Biochemistry. Circulation Research, 92, 827-839.
30. Allan J. A., Docherty A. J., Barker P. J., Huskisson N. S., Reynolds J. J., Murphy G. (1995). Binding of gelatinases A and B to type-I collagen and other matrix components. Biochem J., 309, 299–306.
31. Marmar J. L., DeBenedictis T. J., Praiss D. (1985). The management of varicoceles by microdissection of the spermatic cord at the external inguinal ring. Fertil Steril., 43(4), 583-8.
32. De Clerk Y. A., Perez N., Shimada H. et al. (1992). Inhibition of invasion and metastasis in cells transfected with an inhibitor of metalloproteinases. Cancer research, 52, 701-8.
33. Beaudeux J. L., Giral P., Brucker E., Foglietti M. J., Chapman M. J. (2004). Matrix metalloproteinases, inflammation and atherosclerosis: therapeutic perspectives. Clin Chem Lab Med., 42, 121–31.
34. Barbour J. R., Spinale F. G., Ikonomidis J. S. (2007). Proteinase systems and thoracic aortic aneurysm progression. J Surg Res., 139, 292–307.
35. Choke E., Cockerill G. W., Dawson J., Wilson R. W., Jones A., Loftus I. M., Thompson M. M. (2006). Increased angiogenesis at the site of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. Ann N Y Acad Sci., 1085, 315–319.
36. Chew D. K. W., Conte M. S. , Khalil R. A. (2004). Matrix metalloproteinase- specific inhibition of Ca2+ entry mechanisms of vascular contraction. J Vasc Surg., 40, 1001–10.
37. Raffetto J. D., Ross R. L., Khalil R. A. (2007). Matrix metalloproteinase-2 induced venous dilation via hyperpolarization and activation of K+ channels: Relevance to varicose vein formation. J Vasc Surg., 45, 373–80.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.