Quality indicators in health care systems: National Resources Focus on Results, Processes and Productivity
ARTICLE PDF (Українська)

Keywords

quality indicators of health care
performance measurement
quality indicators of preventive medical care

How to Cite

Dyachuk, D., Lishchishina, O., Zyukov, O., & Gandzyuk, V. (2022). Quality indicators in health care systems: National Resources Focus on Results, Processes and Productivity. Clinical and Preventive Medicine, (1), 90-101. https://doi.org/10.31612/2616-4868.1(19).2022.11

Abstract

Introduction. Measuring the quality of health care in a country is one of the essential features of health quality improvement systems.
The Aim of the Study. Studying the experience of countries with strong economies in monitoring and evaluating the quality of health care, comparing with domestic experience in this area.

Materials and methods. The results of a review of English-language sites with data on measuring clinical indicators in the UK, Canada and the USA and websites of the national healthcare system (Ministry of Health of Ukraine, Center for Medical Statistics of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine, State Expert Center of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine, National Health Service of Ukraine) are given.

Results and discussion. It was found that in all countries with the data analyzed in our work, the tasks of continuous improvement of the quality of health care are solved due to the connection with clinical recommendations, state support for the processes of measuring the health care quality, the provision of software for calculations and the transparency of the definition of indicators.

Since 2018, parallel processes have been going on in the domestic healthcare system: а) clinical quality indicators are approved as part of industry standards in healthcare; b) indicators demonstrating the volumes of medical care are collected and processed by the Center for Medical Statistics of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine, c) The National Health Service of Ukraine generates special indicators based on the data of providers and users of medical services, processes, analyzes and publishes anonymized open data in the Unified State Open Data Web Portal in the form of special dashboards; these indicators are partly relevant to clinical indicators of quality.

Сonclusions: Based on a comparison of the indicators used by different countries, the connection of quality indicators with evidence-based data, further steps of a systematic approach in the field of improving the quality of medical care are determined, since the main tool for monitoring and evaluating medical care are special indicators - quality indicators. These indicators are calculated retrospectively according to standardized methods defined at the national level, which contributes to the transparency and accountability of health care. At the same time, the connection with evidence and clinical guidelines, software, templates and calculation formulas, scope and limitations, etc. are clearly defined and easily accessible, the number and types of indicators vary from country to country. In healthcare institutions, indicators are calculated using information technology based on patient data, focusing on aspects of the quality of care such as effectiveness and productivity. A systematic improvement in the quality of health care in practice can be achieved due to the relevance of the indicators calculated in the electronic health system with the evidence-based provisions of national clinical recommendations and the requirements of industry standards in the field of healthcare.

https://doi.org/10.31612/2616-4868.1(19).2022.11
ARTICLE PDF (Українська)

References

Сouncil of Europe Recommendation no. r (97) 17 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the development and implementation of quality improvement systems (qis) in health care. https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=0900001680506e0d

Improving healthcare quality in Europe: Characteristics, effectiveness and implementation of different strategies [https://www.euro.who.int/en/publications/abstracts/improving-healthcare-quality-in-europe-characteristics,-effectiveness-and-implementation-of-different-strategies-2019]. Health Policy Series, No. 53. Busse R, Klazinga N, Panteli D, et al., editors. Copenhagen (Denmark): European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2019.

Papanicolas I, Smith P. WHO, on behalf of the European Observatory. Open University Press; Maidenhead: 2013. Health system performance comparison: an agenda for policy, information and research.

EC. So What? Strategies across Europe to assess quality of care. Report by the Expert Group on Health Systems Performance Assessment. European Commission (EC). Brussels: European Commission; 2016.

OECD. Patient-Reported Indicators Survey (PaRIS). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2019. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/health/paris.htm, accessed 8 February 2019.

Improving healthcare quality in Europe: Characteristics, effectiveness and implementation of different strategies [Internet]. Health Policy Series, No. 53. Busse R, Klazinga N, Panteli D, et al., editors. Copenhagen (Denmark): European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2019

Carinci F, et al. Towards actionable international comparisons of health system performance: expert revision of the OECD framework and quality indicators. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2015;27(2):137–46. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25758443/

Porter M. What is value in health care. New England Journal of Medicine. 2010;363(26):2477–81. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21142528/.

ICHOM. Standard Sets. International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM). 2019. https://www.ichom.org/standard-sets /, accessed 8 February 2019.

Martin Lawrence (Professor of General Practice) (Lecturer in General Practice) & Frede Olesen (1997) Indicators of Quality in Health Care, The European Journal of General Practice, 3:3, 103-108, DOI: 10.3109/13814789709160336

Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966. Milbank Q. 2005;83(4):691-729. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00397.x

Наказ МОЗ України від 01.08.2011 р. № 454 «Про затвердження Концепції управління якістю медичної допомоги у галузі охорони здоров'я в Україні на період до 2020 року» https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v0454282-11#Text

Наказ МОЗ України від 19.09.2011 р. № 597 «Про затвердження Галузевої програми стандартизації медичної допомоги на період до 2020 року» https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v0597282-11#Text

Методика розробки системи індикаторів якості медичної допомоги, затвердженою наказом МОЗ України від 28.09.2012 р. № 751 «Про створення та впровадження медико-технологічних документів зі стандартизації медичної допомоги в системі Міністерства охорони здоров’я України», зареєстрованою в Міністерстві юстиції України 29.11.2012 р. за № 2002/22314 https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z2002-12#n4

Наказ МОЗ України від 11.09.2013 р. № 795 “Про моніторинг клінічних індикаторів якості медичної допомоги”, зареєстрований в Міністерстві юстиції України 27.09.2013 р. № 1669/24201 https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1669-13#Text.

Наказ МОЗ України від 19.06.2014 р. № 414 «Про затвердження Переліку клінічних індикаторів, що підлягають моніторингу, при лікуванні осіб з гіпертонічною хворобою та цукровим діабетом 2 типу», зареєстрований в Міністерстві юстиції України 07.07.2014 р. № 737/25514 https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0737-14#Text.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.