CURRENT ASPECTS OF ENGAGING PATIENTS TO SHARED DECISION-MAKING AND PARTNER PARTICIPATION IN THE TREATMENT PROCESS (review)
ARTICLE PDF (Українська)

Keywords

patient-centered care
shared decision-making
patient`s education
self-management
education of doctors

How to Cite

Moroz, G. Z., Holovanova, I. A., Bychkova, S., & Dzyzinska, O. O. (2023). CURRENT ASPECTS OF ENGAGING PATIENTS TO SHARED DECISION-MAKING AND PARTNER PARTICIPATION IN THE TREATMENT PROCESS (review). Clinical and Preventive Medicine, (2), 89-98. https://doi.org/10.31612/2616-4868.2(24).2023.13

Abstract

The aim of the research: to conduct an analysis and generalization of scientific publications on the engaging patients to shared decision-making and partner participation in the treatment process.

Materials and methods. The analysis and generalization of scientific publications on the implementation of shared decision-making strategy and the engaging of patients to self-management and participation in the treatment process were carried out. Methods were used: systematic approach, bibliosemantic, analytical.

Results. In modern conditions, partner participation of patients in the treatment process has become a mandatory component of the development of a patient- centered model of medical care and is recommended by the WHO. A necessary component of this process is the implementation of shared decision-making strategy by the doctor and the patient. Organizational approaches to the implementation of the shared decision-making strategy in clinical practice are being improved and generalized, in particular, in 2021 NICE (Great Britain) experts published guideline NG197 «Shared decision-making». One of the most important factors of the shared decision-making strategy implementation in clinical practice is the training of medical staff on improving communication skills and empathy, engaging the patient to independent control of the disease, etc. WHO pays considerable attention to the engaging of patients self-management of health status and treatment results, as a component of patient partnership in the organization of medical care. It has been proven that self-management programs reduce the number of unplanned hospitalizations of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bronchial asthma, heart failure, etc. A wide range of approaches have been proposed to support patient engagement in self-management and partnership in treatment, including information leaflets, online peer support, individual counselling, group educational sessions, telephone coaching, symptom monitoring technologies and change interventions psychological behavior.

Conclusions: The implementation of a patient-centered model of medical care requires engaging patients in the treatment process as partners, which involves joint decision-making by the doctor and patient and self-management. It is essential to improve the communication skills of physicians and educate patients about participating in shared decision-making and self-management.

https://doi.org/10.31612/2616-4868.2(24).2023.13
ARTICLE PDF (Українська)

References

Multimorbidity care model: Recommendations from the consensus meeting of the Joint Action on Chronic Diseases and Promoting Healthy Ageing across the Life Cycle (JA-CHRODIS) (2018) HealthPolicy, 122(1), 4-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.09.006

Priorities for health systems strengthening in the WHO European Region 2015–2020: walking the talk on people centredness (2015) https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/282963/65wd13e_HealthSystemsStrengthening_150494.pdf

Diachuk D.D. Hidzynska I.M., Moroz G. Z., & Tkachuk I. M. (2020) Current approaches to medical care optimization for patients with multimorbidity. Medicni Perspektivi (Medical Perspectives), 25(4), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2020.4.221220

Strengthening people-centred health systems in the WHO European Region: framework for action on integrated health services delivery. (2016) https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/315787/66wd15e_FFA_IHSD_160535.pdf

Gobeil-Lavoie A-P Chouinard M-C, Danish A., & Hudon C. Characteristics of self-management among patients with complex health needs: a thematic analysis review BMJ Open 2019;9:e028344. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028344

Chen, J., Mullins, C. D., Novak, P., & Thomas, S. B. (2016). Personalized strategies to activate and empower patients in health care and reduce health disparities. Health Education & Behavior, 43(1), 25- 34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198115579415

2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: Developed by the Task Force for cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice with representatives of the European Society of Cardiology and 12 medical societies With the special contribution of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC)( 2021). European Heart Journal, 42(34), 3227–3337. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484

Lorig KR , & Holman H (2003) Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med, 26, 1–7.DOI:10.1207/S15324796ABM2601_01

Bouniols N, Leclère B, & Moret L.(2016) Evaluating the quality of shared decision making during the patient-carer encounter: a systematic review of tools. BMC Res Notes, 9, 382. https://bmcresnotes.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13104-016-2164-6

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2021) Shared decision making. NICE guideline [NG197]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng197

Gulbrandsen P. (2020) Shared decision making: improving doctor-patient communication. BMJ, 368, m97. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m97.

Beach M.C., & Sugarman J. (2019) Realizing shared decision-making in practice. JAMA, 322(9), 811-812. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.9797.

Dimopoulos-Bick T, Osten R, Shipway C, Trevena L, & Hoffmann T. (2019) Shared decision making implementation: a case study analysis to increase uptake in New South Wales. Aust Health Rev, 43(5),492–9. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH18138.

Kienlin S, Nytrøen K, Stacey D, &Kasper J. (2020) Ready for shared decision making: Pretesting a training module for health professionals on sharing decisions with their patients. J Eval Clin Pract, 26(2), 610-621. DOI: 10.1111/jep.13380.

Diouf, Nt, Menear, M., Robitaille, H., Painchaud Guerard, G., & Legare, F. (2016) Training health professionals in shared decision making: update of an international environmental scan. Patient Educ. Couns., 99 , 1753-1758. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.06.008.

Oeriemans, A.J.M., Knippenberg, M.L., & Olthuis, G.J. (2021) Learning shared decision-making in clinical practice. Patient Education and Counseling, 104 (5), 1206-1212.

Lasytsia, T.S., Moroz, G.Z., & Hidzynska, I.M.(2022). Zaprovadzhennia bezperervnoi profesiinoi osvity likariv z pytan likuvannia khvorykh na ishemichnu khvorobu sertsia z komorbidnoiu patolohiieiu [Introduction of continuous professional education of doctors in the treatment of patients with coronary heart disease with comorbid pathology] Klinichna ta profilaktychna medytsyna 1(19), 4-10. https://doi.org/10.31612/2616-4868.1(19).2022.01

Guidi, C., & Traversa, C. (2021) Empathy in patient care: from ‘Clinical Empathy’ to ‘Empathic Concern’. Med Health Care and Philos, 24, 573–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-021-10033-4

Praktyky komunikatyvnoi kultury v medychnomu zakladi. Patsiient-tsentrovanyi pidkhid [Practices of communicative culture in a medical institution. A patient-centered approach] (2020). 72. https://www.ua.undp.org/content/ukraine/uk/home/library/recovery-and-peacebuilding/communication-culture-in-healthcare.html

Roberts, BW, Puri, NK, Trzeciak, CJ, Mazzarelli, AJ, & Trzeciak, S. (2021) Socioeconomic, racial and ethnic differences in patient experience of clinician empathy: Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 16(3), e0247259. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247259

Mah, H.C., Muthupalaniappen, L., & Chong .W.(2016) Perceived involvement and preferences in shared decision-making among patients with hypertension. Family Practice, 33 (3), 296–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmw012.

Kuipers, S.J., Nieboer, A.P., & Cramm, J.M.(2020) Views of patients with multi-morbidity on what is important for patient-centered care in the primary care setting. BMC Family Practice, 21, 71. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01144-7

Ferrer, L. (2015). Engaging patients, carers and communities for the provision of coordinated/integrated health services: strategies and tools. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe. https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/290443/Engaging-patients-carers-communities-provision-coordinated-integrated-health-services.pdf

The European Framework for Action on Integrated Health Services Delivery: an overview (2016). https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/317377/FFA-IHS-service-delivery-overview.pdf

2021 Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: Developed by the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) With the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC (2021). European Heart Journal, 42(36), 3599–3726. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368

Multydystsyplinarnyi patsiient-oriientovanyi pidkhid do likuvannia osteoartrytu: novyny z ESCEO [A multidisciplinary patient-centered approach to osteoarthritis management: news from ESCEO] (2021). Zdorovia Ukrainy 21 storichchia, 22 (515), 20-21. https://health-ua.com/article/68600-multidistciplnarnij-patcntorntovanij-pdhd-do-lkuvannya-osteoartritu-novini-

Thompson, D.M., Booth, L., Moore, D., & Mathers J. (2022). Peer support for people with chronic conditions: a systematic review of reviews. BMC Health Serv Res, 22, 427. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07816-7

Walshe C, & Roberts D (2018). Peer support for people with advanced cancer: a systematically constructed scoping review of quantitative and qualitative evidence. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care, 12, 308–22. DOI: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000370.

Krishnamoorthy, Y, Sakthivel, M, Sarveswaran, G, Eliyas, SK. (2019). Effectiveness of peer led intervention in improvement of clinical outcomes among diabetes mellitus and hypertension patients-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prim Care Diabetes, 13,158–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2018.11.007.

Kew KM, Carr R, & Crossingham I. (2017) Lay-led and peer support interventions for adolescents with asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev., 4, CD012331. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012331.pub2.

Pellegrini, D., Torlasco, C., Ochoa, J. E., & Parati, G. (2020). Contribution of telemedicine and information technology to hypertension control. Hypertens Res, 43(7), 621-628. doi: 10.1038/s41440-020-0422-4.

Müskens WD, Rongen-van Dartel SAA, Vogel C, Huis A, Adang EMM & van Riel PLCM (2021). Telemedicine in the management of rheumatoid arthritis: maintaining disease control with less health-care utilization. Rheumatol Adv Pract.,7, 5(1), rkaa079. doi: 10.1093/rap/rkaa079.

Monaghesh E. & Hajizadeh А. (2020). The role of telehealth during COVID-19 outbreak: a systematic review based on current evidence BMC Public Health, 20, 1193. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09301-4

Nakaz MOZ Ukrainy vid 19.10.2015 №681 «Pro zatverdzhennia normatyvnykh dokumentiv shchodo zastosuvannia telemedytsyny u sferi okhorony zdorovia» [On the approval of regulatory documents regarding the use of telemedicine in the field of health care] https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1400-15#Text

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.