CHOICE OF REVASCULARIZATION TECHNIQUE IN PATIENTS WITH ISCHEMIC DIABETIC FOOT
ARTICLE PDF

Keywords

peripheral arterial diseases, diabetic foot, revascularization, angioplasty, vascular surgery, endovascular treatment.

How to Cite

Shapovalov, D. (2021). CHOICE OF REVASCULARIZATION TECHNIQUE IN PATIENTS WITH ISCHEMIC DIABETIC FOOT. Clinical and Preventive Medicine, (4), 18-26. https://doi.org/10.31612/2616-4868.4(18).2021.03

Abstract

Background

Ischemic diabetic foot is determined by trophic disorders of the foot due to a combination of atherosclerosis of the arteries and diabetic lesions. In the United States and some European countries, among major non-traumatic amputations, amputations in patients with diabetes are 45-70%. The use of revascularization can significantly improve the results of treatment of patients with diabetic foot. Features of ischemic diabetic foot require a separate approach to revascularization. There are no generally accepted guidelines for revascularization in diabetic foot in the world today. The choice of revascularization technique remains an open question.

The aim of the study.

To analyze the effectiveness of differentiated application of intervention techniques of revascularization for the treatment of ischemic diabetic foot.

Steps of differentiated choice of revascularization

We identified seven steps: determination of indications for revascularization,

determination of the critical arterial segment. the level of hemodynamic compensation, determination of the feasibility of revascularization, the choice of revascularization technique, the perform revascularization, the active postoperative monitoring.

Materials and methods

Diabetic ischemic foot was diagnosed in 133 observations. 123 revascularizations of 94 lower extremities were performed in 91 patients with ischemic diabetic foot. Patients underwent angioplasty, surgical revascularization or hybrid intervention.

Results

Revascularization was performed in revascularization was performed in 92,4% of patients with ischemic diabetic foot. Amputation-free survival was noted in 85.4% of cases, wound-healing in 62.6%, preservation of foot support function in 79.7%, avoidance of repeated interventions in 78.9%. 5 (5.5%) patients died, 2 of them (2.2:%) within 30 days after revascularization.

Conclusions: Differentiated choice of revascularization technique allows to increase the number of patients to be revascularized 92,4%, to reach of the level amputation-free survival to 85,4%, to reach of the level wound-healing to 62,6%, to salvage of foot support function to 79,7%, to perform revascularizations in patients with a high probability of limb amputation.

https://doi.org/10.31612/2616-4868.4(18).2021.03
ARTICLE PDF

References

Hirsch, A.T., Hiatt, W.R. (2001). Partners: PAD, Awareness, Risk and Treatment: New Resources for Survival. Vascular Medicine, 6, 3, 9-12. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1358836x0100600i103

Roglic, G. (2016). Global report on diabetes World Health Organization.. Retrieved from : https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565257

Prompers, L., et al. (2008). Delivery of care to diabetic patients with foot ulcers in daily practice: results of the Eurodiale Study, a prospective cohort study. Diabetic Medicine, 25 (6), 700-707. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02445.x

Nicolaas C. S. , et al. (2020). IWGDF Editorial Board Practical Guidelines on the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease (IWGDF 2019 update). Diabetes. Metabolism Reearch and Reviews, 36, 1, e3266. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3266

Armstrong D., Boulton A., Bus S. (2017). Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Their Recurrence. The New England journal of medicine, 376(24), 2367-2375. Retrieved from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28614678/ https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra1615439

The North-West Diabetes Foot Care Study: incidence of, and risk factors for, new diabetic foot ulceration in a community-based patient cohort (2002) / Abbott C., et al. Diabetic Medicine, 19 (5), 377-384. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00698.x

Features of revascularization of the lower extremity in patients with diabetic foot / Shapovalov D., Hupalo Y., Shaprynskyi V., Shamray-Sas A., Kutsin A., Gurianov V. Clinical and preventive medicine, 2020, № 3(12), Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00698.x

International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) Guidelines on the Prevention and Management of Diabetic Foot Disease (2019) / Monteiro-Soares M., Russell D., Boyko E., Jeffcoate W., Mills J., Morbach S., Game F. Diabetes/Metbolism research and reviews. 36 (1). P. 3273. Retrieved from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32176445

Moulik P., Mtonga R., Gill G. (2003). Amputation and Mortality in New-Onset Diabetic Foot Ulcers Stratified by Etiology. Diabetes Care, 26(2), 491-494. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.2.491

Trends in Lower-Extremity Amputations in People With and Without Diabetes in Spain, 2001–2008 (2011) / López-de-Andrés A., et al. Epidemiology Health Services Research, 34(7), 1570-1576. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc11-0077

Rümenapf G., Morbach S. (2017). Amputation Statistics-How to Interpret Them? Deutsches Arzteblatt International, 114(8), 128–129. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2017.0128

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Diabetes-Related Amputations of Lower Extremities in the Medicare Population - Minnesota, 1993–1995 (2008). Morbidity and Mortality weekly report, 47 (31), 649-652. Retrieved from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9716396/

Spoden M., Nimptsch U., Mansky T. (2019). Amputation rates of the lower limb by amputation level – observational study using German national hospital discharge data from 2005 to 2015. BMC Health Services Research, 19 (1), 8. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3759-5

BASIL Trial Participants: Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL) trial: A survival prediction model to facilitate clinical decision making (2010) / Bradbury A.W. , et al. Journal of Vasularc Surgery, 51, 52-68. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000137913.26087.f0

Successful Revascularization has a Significant Impact on Limb Salvage Rate and Wound Healing for Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Single-Centre Retrospective Analysis with a Multidisciplinary Approach (2020) / Caetano А., et al. Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, 43(10), 1449-1459. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02604-4

A Definition of Advanced Types of Atherosclerotic Lesions and a Histological Classification of Atherosclerosis (1995). A Report From the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Originally published / Stary H., et al. Circulation, 92, 1355–1374. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.92.5.1355

Taylor G. I. (2003).The angiosomes of the body and their supply to perforator flaps / Department of Plastic Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital. 7th Floor. Clinics in Plastic Surgery, 30, 331 – 342. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0094-1298(03)00034-8

Angiosomes of the Foot and Ankle and Clinical Implications for Limb Salvage: Reconstruction, Incisions, and Revascularization (2006) / Attinger C., et al. Plastic and Reconstruction Surgery, 117, 261-293. Retrieved from: doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000222582.84385.54.

TASC II Working Group. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II) (2007) / Norgren L., et al. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 45 (1), 5-67. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2006.12.037

GVG Writing Group for the Joint Guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS), European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) and World Federation of Vascular Societies (WFVS) (2019) / Conte M.S., et al. Global Vascular Guidelines on the Management of Chronic Limb-Threating Ichemia, 58, 1-109. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2019.02.016

Kanda Y. (2013). Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant, 48, 452-458. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.244

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.